republican Conrad Burns is a fucking idiot
(You're being played)
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Republicans to steal, cheat mid-term elections to prevent prosicution of war crimes and other felonies.
The Bush administration can not allow the Democrats to take control of either house of Congress. And they are in a position to prevent it, regardless of the will of the American voters.
Far more important would be the reestablishment of Congressional oversight -- of investigations, with the penalties of perjury and contempt of Congress, into vast array of crimes committed by the Bush administration. Among these crimes are bribery, the disappearance of billions of dollars in Iraq, war crimes, the disregard of acts of Congress, lying to Congress, and fraudulent elections.
How, then, might the Busheviks avoid accountability for their crimes by remaining in control of the Congress? The same way that they seized control of the White House in 2000, and maintained control of Congress and the White House in 2004, namely by rigging these elections through their surrogates in "the election industry."
The accumulated weight of evidence has moved e-vote fraud well beyond the status of mere accusation. To those willing to examine that evidence scrupulously and objectively, it is now a proven fact. The refusal of the media to deal with this issue and the pathetically weak rebuttal-by-ridicule of the debunkers has not mitigated the force of the evidence. Because I have written repeatedly and at length about the stealing of the national elections, I will not argue the point here. Those still unconvinced are urged to examine these sources. Significantly, despite the aforementioned media silence and weak rebuttals, a Zogby poll reports that less than half the public is "very confident that Bush won [the 2004 election] fair and square," and a third if the public is "not at all confident that he won fair and square."
Given the likelihood of another rigged election, does this mean that those of us who desire a Democratic victory - apparently a sizeable majority of likely voters - should simply give up, accept the inevitable, and stay at home?
Far more important would be the reestablishment of Congressional oversight -- of investigations, with the penalties of perjury and contempt of Congress, into vast array of crimes committed by the Bush administration. Among these crimes are bribery, the disappearance of billions of dollars in Iraq, war crimes, the disregard of acts of Congress, lying to Congress, and fraudulent elections.
How, then, might the Busheviks avoid accountability for their crimes by remaining in control of the Congress? The same way that they seized control of the White House in 2000, and maintained control of Congress and the White House in 2004, namely by rigging these elections through their surrogates in "the election industry."
The accumulated weight of evidence has moved e-vote fraud well beyond the status of mere accusation. To those willing to examine that evidence scrupulously and objectively, it is now a proven fact. The refusal of the media to deal with this issue and the pathetically weak rebuttal-by-ridicule of the debunkers has not mitigated the force of the evidence. Because I have written repeatedly and at length about the stealing of the national elections, I will not argue the point here. Those still unconvinced are urged to examine these sources. Significantly, despite the aforementioned media silence and weak rebuttals, a Zogby poll reports that less than half the public is "very confident that Bush won [the 2004 election] fair and square," and a third if the public is "not at all confident that he won fair and square."
Given the likelihood of another rigged election, does this mean that those of us who desire a Democratic victory - apparently a sizeable majority of likely voters - should simply give up, accept the inevitable, and stay at home?
Gay Republican bashes Gays.
Republican Senator Larry Craig.... What's with the gay bashing?
I'm Shocked! Hypocrisy from a Republican?
I'm Shocked! Hypocrisy from a Republican?
Note to GOP Lawbreakers..
If anyone else would like to clear their criminal records, please don't hesitate.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Don Sherwood (R-Strangler) Yea, I fucked the bitch, but I didn't beat her. Now GIVE ME SOME FUCKING MONEY!!
Sherwood acknowledges he had an affair with the woman, but denies the allegations of abuse.
Now he is in danger of losing his seat, and has been “calling in chits” with “campaign officials and House colleagues.” He’s getting good results. The embattled congressman received about $90,000 from campaign committees and House members in the three-month period ending Oct. 1, according to his latest campaign finance report to the FEC.
Now he is in danger of losing his seat, and has been “calling in chits” with “campaign officials and House colleagues.” He’s getting good results. The embattled congressman received about $90,000 from campaign committees and House members in the three-month period ending Oct. 1, according to his latest campaign finance report to the FEC.
President Cheney's lies & delusions continue to irreparably damage the nation, kill and endanger americans.
There is no other way to put it. For shame you evil bastard.
Update: Support for Iraq war at all time low.
Apparently, Americans don't want their sons and daughters to die for your piece of shit fantasies. Why is that?
Update: Support for Iraq war at all time low.
Apparently, Americans don't want their sons and daughters to die for your piece of shit fantasies. Why is that?
Today President Bush took the constitution and tore it into little pieces.
I don't ever want to hear anyone on the right talk about moral values again. They are concepts which they clearly do not understand. And if they dare to bring up the Bible or Jesus Christ after this I will laugh in their faces, knowing that by their own standards they are going straight to hell for what they've done.
You telling me that Johns Hopkins are fuck ups?
"I loved when President Bush said ‘their methodology has been pretty well discredited,’" Richard Garfield, a public health professor at Columbia University who works closely with a number of the authors of the report, told the Christian Science Monitor. "That’s exactly wrong. There is no discrediting of this methodology. I don’t think there’s anyone who’s been involved in mortality research who thinks there’s a better way to do it in unsecured areas. I have never heard of any argument in this field that says there’s a better way to do it."
Trust me the Dems ain't that couragous.
One pointed to rumors on the Hill that there is the possibility of a Democratic October surprise. "[Former Congressman Mark] Foley wasn't their surprise. That just kinda happened, but people are saying they do have one of their own."
Chimpy doesn't give a fuck.
He's already rogue. He's already out of control. He's already a fucking war criminal. What do you mean, "if the Dems pass a law ChimpCo doesn't like?" What about the existing laws Chimpy ignores right now? No, Chimpy needs to be stopped right the fuck now and it ain't never gonna happen.
No comeuppance. No denigration. No rebuke. Nothing.
When Rove steal the elections, again, in 22 days, stand the fuck by! Who is going to put him in check then? BOMBS AWAY!!!
If Karl fucks up and the Dems do stumble in to power in the house or god forbid both houses, recent history suggests that no one, I repeat NO ONE on the Dem side will do a fucking thing about ChimpCo's extensively documented crimes. Not a goddamm fuckng thing. No special prosecutors, no hearings, no investigations and certainly no impeachment. It's fucking pathetic.
I hope to God I'm wrong.
Denial for Dems. Because Rove will steal this electon too.
"This election isn't about Republicans vs. Democrats. It's about Reality vs. Denial.
We can either vote to accept reality and change course or we can vote for denial
and stay on the wrong path for another 2 years. The thing about reality is that reality
doesn't go away. How bad do things have to get before we vote to drain the swamp?
-- Marc Perkel, from his home in San Bruno, CA (via BartCop)
We can either vote to accept reality and change course or we can vote for denial
and stay on the wrong path for another 2 years. The thing about reality is that reality
doesn't go away. How bad do things have to get before we vote to drain the swamp?
-- Marc Perkel, from his home in San Bruno, CA (via BartCop)
Sticking with failure
Bush called Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on Monday to reassure him that it was not true that the US planned to dump him if he had not produced better results in two months.
Bush hasn't dumped Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who has not produced better results for 3 years, so al-Maliki need not have worried.
Bush hasn't dumped Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who has not produced better results for 3 years, so al-Maliki need not have worried.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)